Current:Home > reviewsJudge overturns $4.7 billion jury award to NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers -Aspire Financial Strategies
Judge overturns $4.7 billion jury award to NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers
View
Date:2025-04-16 17:55:00
A federal judge on Thursday overturned the $4.7 billion jury award in the class action suit for subscribers of the NFL Sunday Ticket programming package.
U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez granted the National Football League's request to toss out the award. The judge said the jury did not follow his instructions and created an "overcharge," he wrote in his order.
Gutierrez also said that models presented during the trial about what a media landscape (and subscription fees) would look like without NFL Sunday Ticket were faulty and "not the product of sound economic methodology," he wrote in the order.
As a result, the damages were more "guesswork or speculation" than figures based on "evidence and reasonable inferences," Gutierrez wrote.
New sports streaming service:Venu Sports sets price at $42.99/month: What you can (and can't) get with it
NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.
What were the jury instructions?
Jurors were instructed to calculate damages based on "the difference between the prices Plaintiffs actually paid for Sunday Ticket and the prices Plaintiffs would have paid had there been no agreement to restrict output.”
DirecTV offered Sunday Ticket from 1994 to 2022, with the cost for residential subscribers typically running between $300 and $400. Last year, Google began offering the programming package via YouTube. This year, NFL Sunday Ticket costs $349 to $449.
On June 27, a federal jury in California awarded NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers more than $4.7 billion in damages and nearly $97 million to bars, restaurants, and other businesses with commercial subscriptions to the package.
The plaintiff's attorneys argued that the NFL, CBS, Fox and DirecTV created a "single, monopolized product" in packaging out-of-market NFL games in the Sunday Ticket package. Because the Sunday Ticket was the only way to get those NFL games, consumers paid inflated prices over the years, the plaintiffs alleged.
The NFL denied any wrongdoing and defended the programming package's distribution model as a premium product.
“We are grateful for today’s ruling in the Sunday Ticket class action lawsuit," the NFL said in a statement sent to USA TODAY. "We believe that the NFL's media distribution model provides our fans with an array of options to follow the game they love, including local broadcasts of every single game on free over-the-air television. We thank Judge Gutierrez for his time and attention to this case and look forward to an exciting 2024 NFL season.”
So what happens now?
The plaintiffs likely could appeal the latest ruling in the case, which began in 2015 when two businesses and two individual subscribers sued on behalf of NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers from 2011.
An estimated 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses bought the NFL Sunday Ticket package from June 17, 2011, to Feb. 7, 2023. In a January 2024 filing, plaintiffs said they were entitled to damages of up to $7.01 billion.
The judge's order stems from the NFL's argument in court on Wednesday that the jury's award should be overturned.
"There's no doubt about what they did," Gutierrez said Wednesday ahead of his ruling, according to Courthouse News. "They didn't follow the instructions."
The subscribers' attorney, Mark Seltzer, told Gutierrez on Wednesday that the jurors should be able to negotiate a fair damages award provided it falls within an evidence-supported range, Courthouse News reported.
Contributing: Michael Middlehurst-Schwartz, Lorenzo Reyes and Brent Schrotenboer.
Follow Mike Snider on X and Threads: @mikesnider & mikegsnider.
What's everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day
veryGood! (12)
Related
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Global Warming Drove a Deadly Burst of Indian Ocean Tropical Storms
- Writers Guild of America goes on strike
- 10 Trendy Amazon Jewelry Finds You'll Want to Wear All the Time
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Plans To Dig the Biggest Lithium Mine in the US Face Mounting Opposition
- Sue Johanson, Sunday Night Sex Show Host, Dead at 93
- Tracking the impact of U.S.-China tensions on global financial institutions
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- How to fight a squatting goat
Ranking
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- Mattel unveils a Barbie with Down syndrome
- Why does the U.S. have so many small banks? And what does that mean for our economy?
- Warmer Nights Caused by Climate Change Take a Toll on Sleep
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Cyberattacks on health care are increasing. Inside one hospital's fight to recover
- In ‘Silent Spring,’ Rachel Carson Described a Fictional, Bucolic Hamlet, Much Like Her Hometown. Now, There’s a Plastics Plant Under Construction 30 Miles Away
- Lindsay Lohan's Totally Grool Road to Motherhood
Recommendation
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Airbnb let its workers live and work anywhere. Spoiler: They're loving it
Should EPA Back-Off Pollution Controls to Help LNG Exports Replace Russian Gas in Germany?
Twitter once muzzled Russian and Chinese state propaganda. That's over now
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
SVB, now First Republic: How it all started
Shares of smaller lenders sink once again, reviving fears about the banking sector
Warming Trends: How Hairdressers Are Mobilizing to Counter Climate Change, Plus Polar Bears in Greenland and the ‘Sounds of the Ocean’